Bargaining and Conflict with Incomplete Information

نویسنده

  • Santiago Sanchez-Pages
چکیده

This paper studies bargaining and conflict under incomplete information, provides an overview and a critical account of the literature on the topic and contributes with original research. We first revise models of mechanism design and sequential bargaining that take confrontation as final. Conflict and inefficiencies are to be expected in these models whenever parties have optimistic prospects on the outcome of the all-out conflict. After examining the causes and reasons for this optimism, we move to the analysis of the recent literature that considers the existence of limited confrontations that allow bargaining to resume. In the presence of private information, these limited conflicts convey information and thus become a bargaining instrument. The paper closes with a discussion on the related empirical literature, the challenges that it faces and some potential avenues for further research. JEL codes: C78, D74, D82.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Bargaining with Incomplete Information: An Infinite-Horizon Model with Two-Sided Uncertainty

The resolution of any bargaining conflict depends crucially on the relative urgency of the agents to reach agreement and the information each agent has about the others’ preferences. This paper explores, within the context of an infinite-horizon bargaining model with two-sided uncertainty, how timing and information affect the rational behaviour of agents when commitment is not possible. Since ...

متن کامل

On Majoritarian Bargaining with Incomplete Information

December 2008 [Abstract] This paper studies a finite horizon version of Baron and Ferejohn’s (1989) majoritarian bargaining with incomplete information. Our devised model essentially blends Spence’s signaling and the coalition formation of majoritarian bargaining. The main findings include: (i) oversized coalitions may arise in equilibrium and allowing for delay can be optimal for a proposer; (...

متن کامل

Bargaining Between Rebel Groups and the Outside Option of Violence

Abstract: Although military cooperation among rebel groups in multi-party civil wars could help rebels defeat or extract concessions from an incumbent government, violent conflict among rebel groups is empirically prevalent. Why do rebel groups in multi-actor civil wars choose to fight one another? This paper models the strategic dilemma facing rebel groups in multi-party civil wars as an alter...

متن کامل

AERE/EAERE World Meeting 1998

Farrell’s comparison of Coasean bargaining under incomplete information with second-best centralized regulation is reconsidered by introducing unsure property rights. Rights are unsure, because environmental law is typically incomplete, meaning that the outcome of taking action against environmental regulation is unsure ex ante. I will explore the efficiency implications of a standing to sue fo...

متن کامل

Bargaining under incomplete information, fairness, and the hold-up problem ¬リニ

This paper investigates the efficiency of incomplete contracts if the investors have heterogenous preferences implying heterogenous bargaining behavior, and if these preferences are private information. In the hold-up problem, incomplete contracts cause the proceeds of the investments to be shared by bargaining. Fair-minded individuals reject positive but unfair offers even if this causes a bar...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011